---------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 1993 by the Christian Research Institute. ---------------------------------------------------------------- COPYRIGHT/REPRODUCTION LIMITATIONS: This data file is the sole property of the Christian Research Institute. It may not be altered or edited in any way. It may be reproduced only in its entirety for circulation as "freeware," without charge. All reproductions of this data file must contain the copyright notice (i.e., "Copyright 1993 by the Christian Research Institute"). This data file may not be used without the permission of the Christian Research Institute for resale or the enhancement of any other product sold. This includes all of its content with the exception of a few brief quotations not to exceed more than 500 words. If you desire to reproduce less than 500 words of this data file for resale or the enhancement of any other product for resale, please give the following source credit: Copyright 1993 by the Christian Research Institute, P.O. Box 500, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92693. ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Does Dr. Walter Martin Have A Genuine Earned Doctor's Degree?" (republished by Christian Research Institute with permission from THE CONTENDER, Huntington Beach, CA 6/87) ------------- Any Latter-day Saint dealing with "anti-Mormon" literature is bound sooner or later to run into the name of *Dr. Walter Martin,* a man who, perhaps more than any other, is cited as the final word on the subject of orthodox Christianity and the cults. Facts which are not disputed concerning *Walter Ralston Martin* are as follows: _He is an ordained Baptist minister_ and a member of the Southern Baptist Convention. He is also sympathetic with the Charismatic movement. He holds four earned degrees including a Master's Degree from New York University. _He is trained in the ancient languages_ of the Scriptures, although he is careful to maintain he is not a linguist. Demonstrably, his areas of expertise are *Religious Education, Philosophy, Ancient Church History* and of the faith." Many Mormons feel this loosely translates *"attack on the faith,"* for if the claims of the LDS church be true, Martin is no defender of anything that is true or holy. The fact which most certainly is disputed is Walter Martin's claim to having an earned doctorate *from a legitimate degree- granting* institution. Arguing most vocally of late against Martin are *Mr. and Mrs. Robert Brown of Arizona* in three extensive publications, *"THEY LIE IN WAIT TO DECEIVE"* Volumes 1, 2 and 3. (Further volumes are contemplated.) _They have flatly rejected the genuineness of Dr. Martin's degree and, indeed, have lumped him together with Dee Jay Nelson,_ a purported Egyptian scholar whose degree, it is agreed by all -- Mormon and non-Mormon -- is an absolute *humbug*, bought and paid for from an outfit in Washington State that was "...by no means even remotely a borderline legitimate school," but was rather "...the most dangerous kind of degree mill.." (BEAR'S GUIDE TO NON-TRADITIONAL COLLEGE DEGREES, 6th Ed., P. 129). _Let us first consider,_ then, if indeed Walter R. Martin has any real claim to be called "Dr." _and then ask ourselves honestly_ what credentials are required to critique the LDS church. First, while this writer is generally uncomfortable with the term "expert" in any application, there most certainly is a uniformly respected expert in the field of Alternative, or Non- traditional College Education. After having had the privilege of communicating with him, I am confident he would likewise prefer some alternate epithet to "expert," but he nonetheless is an expert. His name is Dr. John Bear. His degrees are legion, and they are earned and easily verifiable. Many years ago Dr. Bear became fascinated with the entire concept of college without campus. This fascination led him to a field of research heretofore untouched, and resulted in the publication of "BEAR'S GUIDE TO NON-TRADITIONAL COLLEGE DEGREES," cited above. _Robert and Rosemary Brown,_ in their criticism of Walter Martin's doctoral credentials, pointed out that *California Western University*, now known as *California Coast University*, is operated out of humble headquarters in Santa Ana, California, and does not bear a physical resemblance to what one would conjure up in one's mind when one imagines a university. Dr. Bear, however, is careful to note that _some very fine programs are offered by small schools._ Such apparently is the case with California Coast University. "California Coast University...was one of the first of California's non-resident universities..._CCU is the only non- resident school in California to have received state approval of all degree programs offered_...each _faculty member holds recogni- zed degrees from traditional schools._" Dr. Bear, who, it should be noted, has _no_ interest in any religious controversy, concludes with this observation: "For those persons willing to spend a year or more to earn their (graduate) degree, California Coast University offers an excellent alternative" (BEAR'S GUIDE, 10th Edition, p. 85). _We are therefore compelled to concede that Walter Martin does have a real claim on the academic title "Doctor," having earned his degree from a legitimate institution of alternative higher education._ It should also be noted that Dr. Martin completed all his graduate studies at New York University, a fully accredited school, and simply submitted his thesis at CCU. Honesty compels us to reject the Brown's comparison of Dr. Martin's degree with the phony, dime-store diploma of Dee Jay Nelson. *There is no comparison!* For additional information supporting the accepted status of CCU and Dr. Martin's degree, the California State Department of Education has stated in the California Education Code, Section 94310(b): The degree is conferred by an institution having full institutional approval by the Superintendent of Public Instruction for all degree programs offered. Such institutions have been evaluated favorably as being _consistent with accredited institutions_ in terms of curricula quality and verifiable evidence of graduates' academic achievement. An institute may be granted full institutional approval if the superintendent approves every degree offered by the institution. The law mandates the superin- tendent to determine -- in advance of issuing an approval and in renewing such approval -- by a qualitative review and assessment of the institution through the use of an institutional self-study and a comprehensive onsite evaluation by a qualified visitation committee impaneled by the superintendent: that the curriculum is consistent in quality with curricula offered by established accredited institutions; and the courses achieve their professed objectives, with verifiable evidence of the students' academic achievement being comparable to that required of graduates from accredited institutions. Approved institutions and the degrees and credits they issue are deemed to be meeting the superintendent's standards and those comparative qualitative standards existing in accredited institutions. The degrees and credits earned from approved institutions enjoy relative- ly wide recognition and acceptability. *Now that we have examined Dr. Martin's claims,* let us ask again our second question in this outline, *"What credentials are required to critique the LDS church?"* A key to this question lies in the area of *easily verifiable fact.* For example, what if you are suffering from a mortal disease and someone comes along who claims to be a doctor of some healing art, and tells you that if you will follow his prescrip- tion you will be made well? Obviously, in such a case, you would be a fool not to check such a one's credentials. *His claims are not easily, if at all, verifiable.* However, if someone comes to you and tells you your house is on fire, you need do nothing but peek out the door and look to see if he is telling you the truth. _In other words, easily verifiable fact._ _In the area of Mormonism, Dr. Martin makes certain claims._ He claims *Mormonism is polytheistic.* It is. Plurality of gods is part and parcel of LDS doctrine. Dr. Martin claims *Mormonism is a system of works.* It is. Any LDS individual would be happy to affirm that he or she is working his or her way to the Celestial Kingdom. Dr. Martin claims that *the Book of Mormon has no archaeological endorsement* from any non-Mormon scholar. It truly has no such endorsement. *Even Mormon archaeologists acknowledge this.* Dr. Martin claims that _no matter what your works may be, you will die in your sins if you do not believe that Jesus Christ is God_ (not a god, or a product of sexual intercourse, but God!). Yes, _Walter Martin's doctoral degree is legitimate, and no, it really does not matter._ Down through the centuries God has used both the great and the simple to bring the gospel message: He used the sinner Matthew and the scholar Paul. He used the wealthy Shedd and the destitute Brainerd; He uses great books and even little articles like this one. The message is all the same: *Christ died, was buried, and rose again on the third day.* _Christ did not die for "Adam's transgression alone" but for all "our sins."_ Thank God for His matchless gift, which cannot be earned, which is not for sale at any price! End of document, CRT0001A.TXT (original CRI file name), "Does Dr. Walter Martin Have A Genuine Earned Doctor's Degree?" release A, March 26, 1993 (A special note of thanks to Bob and Pat Hunter for their help in the preparation of this ASCII file for BBS circulation.) In addition, let the readers of this file remember that the Brown's line of response amounts to little more than a "kill the messenger" reaction. The messenger has gone home to his reward. The message has been taken up by many more who join now with an even greater voice; "He who has ears to hear, let him hear." R. Poll, CRI ----------------------------------------------------------------- YOURS FOR THE ASKING The Christian Research Institute (CRI) -- founded in 1960 by the late Dr. Walter R. Martin -- is a clearing house for current, in- depth information on new religious movements and aberrant Christian teachings. We provide well-reasoned, carefully- researched answers to concepts and ideas that challenge orthodox Christianity. Did you know that CRI has a wealth of information on various topics that is yours for the asking? In fact, a free subscription to the Christian Research Newsletter is yours if you contact CRI and ask for one saying that you found out about the offer from this computer text file. We offer a wide variety of articles and fact sheets free of charge. Write us today for information on these or other topics. Our first-rate research staff will do everything possible to help you. Christian Research Institute P.O. Box 500 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92693 (714) 855-9926 --------------- End of file.