Calvin's Commentary on Malachi
    (... continued from file 8)
    
    Lecture One Hundred and Seventy Seventh 
     
    17. Ye have weared the Lord with your words: yet ye say,
    Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that
    doeth evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and he
    delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment? 
     
    17. Fatigastis Iehovam in verbis vestris, et dixistis, In
    quo fatigavimus eum? Quum dicitis, Quicumque facit malum
    gratus est in oculis Iehovae et in ipsis se oblectat;
    vel, Ubi Deus judicii? 
     
         The Prophet here reproves the Jews who expostulated
    with God in their adversity, as though he had
    undeservedly forsaken them, and had not brought them
    immediate help. Thus are hypocrites wont to do; unless
    God immediately assists them, they not only indirectly
    complain, but also break out into open blasphemies; for
    they think that God is bound to them, and hence they
    assail him more boldly, and even with greater freedom and
    insolence. It is indeed a proof of true piety when we
    patiently submit to the judgments of God, and when, as
    Jeremiah teaches us by his own example, "we sustain his
    wrath, because we know that we have sinned." (Jer. 3:14.)
    But as hypocrites are conscious of nothing wrong, (for
    they flatter themselves, and stupify their own
    consciences,) because they examine not themselves, they
    think that God acts unjustly towards them when he does
    not immediately bring them aid. Such was the dishonesty
    of the people of whom the Prophet now speaks. 
     
         He says that they had wearied God, that is, that
    they had been troublesome to him by their clamorous
    complaints; for the verb , igo, means to be weary; he
    says then that they unreasonably complained of God's
    slowness. It is indeed a mode of speaking taken from men,
    for we know that no passions belong to God; but as
    elsewhere God reproves them because they saddened his
    Spirit, (Psalm 106:33,) so he says here that they wearied
    him. We now perceive the Prophet's meaning. 
     
         But there is a dilemma presented in the words; for
    the Jews thought that God favoured the wicked, inasmuch
    as he did not immediately punish them, or that he was now
    unlike himself, and forgot his own nature. The difficulty
    or the dilemma appears not at the first view, as they
    seemed to have repeated the same thing. But in the first
    clause they accuse God of injustice; and in the second
    they intimate that there is no God, for he cannot exist
    without exercising judgment. Then the passages contains
    two clauses differing from each other - "God has either
    changed his nature, and so is no God, or he favours our
    enemies; for he does not immediately execute vengeance."
    We see then that they concluded that God either acted
    unjustly, or that there was no God. But we have mentioned
    the cause of this blasphemy - the Jews did not examine
    themselves, and therefore did not confess that they
    deserved these chastisements. They were like vicious
    horses, who kick and fling, though gently treated by
    their riders. 
     
         But such insolence is now seen in all masked men,
    who vauntingly profess religion when they are treated
    according to their own wishes; but when God deals more
    sharply with them, they not only murmur, but vomit forth,
    as I have already said, impious slanders against him, as
    though he did not render to them the reward due to their
    just dealings. Admonished by this example, let us learn
    that it is true wisdom to humble ourselves under the
    mighty hand of God, (1 Peter 5:6;) and that thoughl he
    may suspend the granting of our prayers, we ought still
    to bear, not impatiently, what is hard and severe, and
    also to subdue our feelings, and to seek from them the
    Spirit of meekness, to retain us in a tranquil
    submission. 
     
         He says that they still replied - In what have we
    wearied thee? Here he strongly reproves their hardness,
    because they did not become wise through the rebuke given
    them, but regarded with scorn the words of the Prophet,
    by which we clearly see that they must have been
    convinced of their guilt, had they not been doubly
    stupid. It was an intolerable reproach cast on God, to
    say that he favoured the ungodly, and was pleased with
    their crimes; for God would thus not only rule as a
    tyrant, but also subvert all order. But nothing is more
    contrary to his nature than to hold forth his hand to the
    ungodly as though he had an alliance with them. As this
    then was an evident impiety, it was a monstrous stupidity
    to ask in what they wearied God; they ought indeed to
    have known that he regards nothing as precious as his own
    honour; and yet, as though Malachi had unjustly reproved
    them, they opposed him with an iron front, according to
    similar instances which we have before observed; for
    though they were covenant-breakers as to marriage, though
    they defrauded God in the tenths, though they cunningly
    evaded the Prophets, they yet as it were wiped their
    mouths and asked, In what had they sinned? The Prophet
    shows that they were become so hardened in their
    contumacy that they daringly rejected all admonitions;
    for they did not ask this as though it was a doubtful
    thing, nor can it be concluded from their words that they
    were teachable; but it was the same as if they were
    armed, ready for a contest, yea, armed with effrontery
    and perverseness; for they no doubt despised and
    ridiculed the Prophet's reproof. 
     
         He then answers them - When ye say, Whosoever doeth
    evil is acceptable in the eyes of Jehovah, and in them he
    delights. The word rendered "acceptable" is "tov", but
    such is its meaning often in Hebrew. What they said was,
    that the ungodly and the wicked pleased God, even because
    they covered by false colours their sins, so that they
    were not convinced of anything wrong. They then imputed
    whatever was evil to their enemies; they did not commonly
    expostulate with God because he left sins unpunished, but
    because they received not his aid. We hence see that the
    Jews here did not clamour and contend with God through
    hatred of wickedness, but had only a regard to their own
    advantages; nor did they condemn the sins of others,
    except those by which they received some harm or loss,
    and that they considered none wicked except those by whom
    they were injured. We hence learn that they did not
    complain through zeal for what was right, but because
    they would have God bound to them to undertake their
    cause like earthly patrons. 
     
         We indeed know that even the godly are sometimes
    wearied, and their faith is ready to fail, when things in
    the world are in a disturbed and confused state: and this
    was the case with David, as it is recorded in the
    seventy-third Psalm; but there is in the servants and
    sincere worshipers of God some concern for what is just
    and right, whenever they have such grief and trouble of
    mind, according to the case of Habakkuk, when he said,
    "How long, O Lord!" (Hab. 1:2;) for no doubt his
    complaint arose from a right principle, because his
    desire was that God should be truly served in the world.
    But there was nothing of this kind in the Jews, with whom
    our Prophet contends here; for as we have said, there was
    no hatred of wickedness, but only a care for their own
    advantage; they hence said, that the ungodly pleased God,
    because God did not immediately interpose when they
    apprehended some trouble from their enemies. 
     
         The repetition is a proof of greater bitterness; for
    they were not content with one clamorous expression, but
    added, that God took delight in them. 
     
         Then follows the other clause, or where is the God
    of judgment? They seem not here to reason amiss, that is,
    from the nature of God. Men may change their counsel and
    their design, and remain men still, for they are subject
    to inconstancy and fickleness; but to God there belongs
    no change. There seems not then to be an impropriety in
    this - that there is no God, except he be the judge of
    the world; for he cannot divest himself of his office
    without denying himself. But they malignantly impeached
    God; nay, they now insinuate that there is none, because
    he had abdicated his judgment; for they took it as
    granted, that God had ceased to be the punisher of
    wickedness, which was most false; but yet they thought
    that according to facts it was certain and clear. Hence
    they concluded that there was no God, as his divinity
    must have been abolished together with his judgment. We
    hence see to what extent of insolence they burst forth in
    their complaints, so that they either charged God with
    injustice, or alleged that his divinity was annihilated.
    Now follows 
     
     CHAPTER 3: 
     
    1 Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare
    the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall
    suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the
    covenant, who ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith
    the Lord of hosts. 
     
    1 Ecce ego mitto Angelum meum, et purgabit viam coram
    facie mea; et mox veniet ad templum suum Dominus, quem
    vos quaeritis, et Angelus foederis quem vos expetitis;
    ecce venit, dicit Iehova exercituum. 
     
         Here the Prophet does not bring comfort to the
    wicked slanderers previously mentioned, but asserts the
    constancy of his faith in opposition to their blasphemous
    words; as such is its meaning often in Hebrew. What they
    said was, that the ungodly and the wicked pleased God,
    even because they covered by false colors their sins, so
    that they were not convinced of anything wrong. They then
    imputed whatever was evil to their enemies; they did not
    commonly expostulate with God because he left sins
    unpunished, but because they received not his aid. We
    hence see that the Jews here did not clamour and contend
    with God through hatred of wickedness, but had only a
    regard to their own advantages; nor did they condemn the
    sins of others, except those by which they received some
    harm or loss, and that they considered none wicked except
    those by whom they were injured. We hence learn that they
    did not complain through zeal for what was right, but
    because they would have God bound to them to Undertake
    their cause like earthly patrons.     We indeed know that
    even the godly are sometimes wearied, and their faith is
    ready to fail, when things in the world are in a
    disturbed and confused state: and this was the case with
    David, as it is recorded in the seventy-third Psalm; but
    there is in the servants and sincere worshipers of God
    some concern for what is just and right, whenever they
    have such grief and trouble of mind, according to the
    case of Habakkuk, when he said, "How long, O Lord!" (Hab.
    1: 2;) for no doubt his complaint arose front a right
    principle, because his desire was that God should be
    truly served in the world. But there was nothing of this
    kind in the Jews, with whom our Prophet contends here;
    for as we have said, there was no hatred of wickedness,
    but only a care for their own advantage; they hence said,
    that the ungodly pleased God, because God did not
    immediately interpose when they apprehended some trouble
    from their enemies.     The repetition is a proof of
    greater bitterness; for they were not content with one
    clamorous expression, but added, that God took delight in
    them.     Then follows the other clause, or where is the
    God of judgment? They seem not here to reason amiss, that
    is, from the nature of God. Men may change their counsel
    and their design, and remain men still, for they are
    subject to inconstancy and fickleness; but to God there
    belongs no change. There seems not then to be an
    impropriety in this - that there is no God, except he be
    the judge of the world; for he cannot divest himself of
    his office without denying himself But they malignantly
    impeached God; nay, they now insinuate that there is
    none, because he had abdicated his judgment; for they
    took it as granted, that God had ceased to be the
    punisher of wickedness, which was most false; but yet
    they thought that according to facts it was certain and
    clear. Hence they concluded that there was no God, as his
    divinity must have been abolished together with his
    judgment. We hence see to what extent of insolence they
    burst forth in their complaints, so that they either
    charged God with injustice, or alleged that his divinity
    was annihilated. Now follows 
     
     CHAPTER 3: 
     
    Mal 3:1 Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall
    prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek,
    shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of
    the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come,
    saith the LORD of hosts.          Here the Prophet does
    not bring comfort to the wicked slanderers previously
    mentioned, but asserts the constancy of his faith in
    opposition to their blasphemous words; as though he had
    said, "Though they impiously declare that they have been
    either deceived or forsaken by the God in whom they had
    hoped, yet his covenant shall not be in vain." The design
    of what is announced is like that of the declaration made
    elsewhere, "Though men are perfidious and false, yet God
    remains true, and cannot depart from his own nature."
    (Num. 23: 19.) God then does here gloriously triumph over
    the Jews, and alleges his own covenant in opposition to
    their disgraceful slanders, because their wicked
    murmurings could not hinder him to accomplish his
    promises and to perform in due time what they thought
    would never be done; and he adopts a demonstrative adverb
    in order to show the certainty of what is said.    
    Behold, he says, 1 send my messenger, who will clear the
    way before my face.' This passage ought doubtless to be
    understood of John the Baptist, for Christ himself so
    explains it, than whom no better interpreter can be
    found; and since John the Baptist was the messenger of
    Christ, the beginning of the verse can be applied to no
    other person. Afterwards the Father himself speaks as we
    shall see: but as he who appeared in the flesh is the
    same God with the Father, it is no wonder that he speaks,
    and then that the words which follow are spoken in the
    person of the Father.     There is here a striking
    allusion to Moses, whose office it was to intercede, that
    God might not in his just wrath destroy the whole people;
    for as then the majesty of God was more than could be
    borne without an intercessor, so that the people through
    fear cried out "Speak thou to us lest we die," (Ex. 20:
    19,) so also now does Malachi teach us, that there is
    need of an intercessor, by whom God's wrath might be
    mitigated, which the Jews had extremely provoked. This
    office John the Baptist undertook, who prepared the Jews
    to hear the voice of Christ.     By saying that he would
    send a messenger to clear his way, he indirectly reproved
    the Jews, by whom many hindrances were thrown as it were
    in the way; as though he had said, "They prevent by the
    obstacles they raise up the redemption and the promised
    salvation to be revealed: there will therefore be the
    need of a messenger to clear the way." For the Jews had
    introduced impediments, as though they designedly wished
    to resist the favor which had been prepared and promised
    to them. But how the Baptist performed his work by
    clearing the way, is evident from the fortieth chapter of
    Isaiah, as well as from the Gospels; and hence may be
    gathered what I have already said - that God by his
    fidelity and mercy struggled with those obstacles which
    the Jews had raised up to prevent the coming of Christ.' 
       He afterwards adds, And presently shall come to his
    temple the Lord, whom ye seek. After having said that he
    would open a way for his favor, he now adds, come shall
    the Lord. He introduces here, not Jehovah, but the Lord,
    "Adon"; and hence he speaks distinctly of Christ, who is
    afterwards called the Angel or Messenger of the covenant.
    But the word "Adon" commonly used for a Mediator, as in
    Ps. 110, and also in Dan. 9:17; where it is expressly
    said, "Hear, O Jehovah, for the sake of the Lord,"
    "lema'an Adonai"; the word is the same as here, come then
    shall the Lord. The reason for this mode of speaking was,
    because Christ was shown to them under the type which re
    presented him. As then the kingdom of David was a
    representation of the kingdom of Christ our Lord, it is
    no wonder that the Prophets designate him by this title,
    especially those who were the nearest to the time of
    Christ's manifestation. But he is promised by another
    title, the angel or messenger of the covenant; but it
    means not the same here as in the first clause. He called
    John the Baptist at the beginning of this verse a
    messenger, the messenger of Jehovah; and now he calls
    Christ a messenger, but he is the messenger of the
    covenant; for it was necessary that the covenant should
    be confirmed by him. The title of John the Baptist was
    then inferior to that of Christ; for though he was God
    manifested in the flesh, yet this did not prevent him
    from being God's minister and interpreter in order to
    confirm his covenant; and we know that the office of
    Christ consists in confirming and sealing to us the
    covenant of God, not only by his doctrine, but also by
    his blood and the sacrifice of his cross.         
    Malachi then promises here to the Jews both a king and a
    reconciler, - a king under tee title of Lord, - and a
    reconciler under the title of the messenger of the
    covenant: and we know it was the main thing in the whole
    doctrine of the law, that a Redeemer was to come, to
    reconcile the Church to Cod and to rule it.     And he
    says that the Mediator was sought and expected by the
    Jews; and through him God was to be propitious to them:
    but this was not said but ironically. The faithful indeed
    at this day have all their desires fixed on Christ, after
    he has been revealed in the flesh, until they shall
    partake at his last coming of the fruit of his death and
    resurrection; and under the law we know that the groaning
    and the sighings of the godly were towards Christ: but
    Malachi here, by way of contempt, checks these
    unreasonable charges, by which the Jews accused God, as
    though he had disappointed their hope and their prayers.
    For we have said, and the fact is evident, that God had
    been presumptuously and shamefully impeached by them, as
    though he meant not to fulfil his promises: hence the
    Prophet says ironically, and sharply too, that Christ was
    expected by the Jews, for they murmured, because God had
    too long deferred his coming: "O! where is the Redeemer?
    when will he be revealed to us?" Since then they thus
    pretended that they earnestly expected the coming of
    Christ, the Prophet upbraids them with this, and justly
    too, for they had expressly manifested their unbelief.   
     Behold, he comes, saith Jehovah of hosts. Here he
    introduces the Father as the speaker, as it has been
    already stated; and the particle "hinneh", behold, is
    used for the sake of removing every doubt; and then he
    confirms what he says by the authority of God. He might
    have asserted this in his own person as a teacher; but in
    order to produce an effect on the Jews by the majesty of
    God, he makes him the author of this prophecy. It follows
    - 
     
    Malachi 3:2 But who may abide the day of his coming? and
    who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a
    refiner's fire, and like fuller's soap.          The
    Prophet in this verse contends more sharply with the
    Jews, and shows that it was a mere presence that they so
    much expected the coming of the Mediator, for they were
    far different from him through the whole course of their
    life. And when he says that the coming of Christ would be
    intolerable, what is said is to be confined to the
    ungodly; for we know that nothing is more delightful and
    sweeter to us than when Christ is nigh us: though now we
    are pilgrims and at a distance from him, yet his
    invisible presence is our chief joy and happiness. (Rom.
    8: 22, 23.) Besides, were not the expectation of his
    coming to sustain our minds, how miserable would be our
    condition! It is therefore by this mark that the faithful
    are to be distinguished, - that they expect his coming;
    and Paul does not in vain exhort us, by the example of
    heaven and earth, to be like those in travail, until
    Christ appears to us as our Redeemer.     But the Prophet
    here directs his discourse to the ungodly, who though
    they seem to burn with desire for God's presence, do not
    yet wish him to be nigh them, but they flee from him as
    much as they can. We have met with a similar passage in
    Amos, "Wo to those who desire the day of the Lord! What
    will it be to you? for it will be darkness, yea darkness
    and not light, a day of sorrow and not of joy." (Amos 5:
    18.) Amos in this passage spoke on the same subject; for
    the Jews, inflated with false confidence, thought that
    God could not forsake them, as he had pledged his faith
    to them; but he reminded them that God had been so
    provoked by their sins, that he was become their
    professed and sworn enemy. So also in this place, Come,
    the Prophet says, come shall the Redeemer; but this will
    avail you nothing; on the contrary, his coming will be
    dreadful to you. We indeed know that Christ appeared not
    for salvation to all, but only to the remnant, and to
    those of Jacob who repented, according to what Isaiah
    says. (Isaiah 10: 21, 22.) But since they obstinately
    rejected the favour of God, it is no wonder that the
    Prophet excluded them from the blessings of the Redeemer.

       Who then will endure his coming? and who shall stand
    at his appearance? as though he had said, "In vain do ye
    flatter yourselves, and even upbraid God, that he retains
    the promised Redeemer as it were hidden in his own bosom;
    for he will come in due time, but without any advantage
    to you; nor will it be given you to enjoy his favour; but
    on the contrary he will bring to you nothing but terrors;
    for he will be like a purifying fire, and as the herb of
    the fullers. The latter clause may be taken in a good or
    a bad sense, as it is evident from the next verse. The
    power of the fire, we know, is twofold; for it burns and
    it purifies; it burns what is corrupt; but it purifies
    gold and silver from their dross. The Prophet no doubt
    meant to include both, for in the next verse he says,
    that Christ will be as fire to purify and to refine the
    sons of Levi as gold and silver. With regard then to the
    people of whom he has been hitherto speaking, he shows
    that Christ will be like fire, to burn and consume their
    filth; for though they boasted with their mouth of their
    religion, yet we know that the Church of God had many
    defilements and pollutions; they were therefore to perish
    by fire. But Malachi teaches us at the same time, that
    the whole Church was not to perish, for the Lord would
    purify the sons of Levi.     There is here a part stated
    for the whole; for the promise belongs to the whole
    Church. The sons of Levi were the first-fruits, and the
    whole people were in the name of that tribe consecrated
    to God. This is the reason why he mentions the sons of
    Levi rather than the whole people; as though he had said,
    that though the Church was corrupt and polluted, there
    would yet be a residue which God would save, having
    purified them. The words which I had omitted are these - 
     
    Malachi 3:3 And he shall sit [as] a refiner and purifier
    of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and
    purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto
    the LORD an offering in righteousness.          The
    Prophet says, that Christ would sit to purify the sons of
    Levi; for though they were the flower, as it were, and
    the purity of the Church, they had yet contracted some
    contagion from the corruption which prevailed. Such then
    was the contagion, that not only the common people became
    corrupt, but even the Levites themselves, who ought to
    have been guides to others, and who were to be in the
    Church as it were the pattern of holiness. God however
    promises that such would be the purifying which Christ
    would effect, and so regulated, that it would consume the
    whole people, and yet purify the elect, and purify them
    like silver, that they may be saved. He tells us
    afterwards that the Levites themselves would need a trial
    to cleanse them; for they themselves would not be without
    filth, because they had mixed with a perverse people, who
    had wholly departed from the law, and from the fear and
    the worship of God. 
     
     Prayer. 
     
    Grant, Almighty God, that since we are by nature so prone
    to rash judgement, we may learn to submit to thee, and so
    quietly to acquiesce in thy judgements, that we may
    patiently bear whatever chastisements thou mayest daily
    allot to us, and not doubt but that all is done for our
    well-being, and never murmur against thee, but give thee
    the glory in all our adversities; and may we so labour to
    mortify our flesh, that by denying ourselves we may ever
    allow thee to be the only true God, and a just avenger,
    and our Father, and that thus renouncing ourselves, we
    may yet never depart from the purity of thy word, and be
    thus retained under thy yoke, until we shall at length
    attain that liberty which has been procured for us by
    thine only-begotten Son. - Amen. 


    Calvin's Commentary on Malachi
    (continued in file 10...)




    ----------------------------------------------------
    file: /pub/resources/text/ipb-e/epl-09: cvmal-09.txt
    .