Home>Christian Videos>Bible Stories>Why Are Matthew, Mark, And Luke Called The Synoptic Gospels?

Why Are Matthew, Mark, And Luke Called The Synoptic Gospels? Why Are Matthew, Mark, And Luke Called The Synoptic Gospels?

Bible Stories

Why Are Matthew, Mark, And Luke Called The Synoptic Gospels?

Written by: Tomasina Schmid

Discover the significance of the Synoptic Gospels in the Bible and understand why Matthew, Mark, and Luke are known as the Synoptic Gospels. Explore the unique perspectives and connections between these biblical accounts.

(Many of the links in this article redirect to a specific reviewed product. Your purchase of these products through affiliate links helps to generate commission for Christian.net, at no extra cost. Learn more)

Table of Contents

Introduction

Why are Matthew, Mark, and Luke called the Synoptic Gospels? The term "Synoptic Gospels" is derived from the Greek words "syn" meaning "together" and "opsis" meaning "seeing." This term is used to describe the first three Gospels of the New Testament, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, due to their similar content, structure, and the fact that they can be viewed together in parallel. The question of why these three Gospels are referred to as the Synoptic Gospels is a fascinating one that delves into the intricacies of biblical scholarship and the historical context of the early Christian church. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this designation and delve into the significance of the Synoptic Gospels in Christian tradition.

 

The Similarities and Differences Among the Synoptic Gospels

The Synoptic Gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, share a significant amount of common material, including similar accounts of Jesus' teachings, miracles, and the events of his life. These similarities are often presented in parallel passages, allowing for a comparative study of the Gospels. The parallel structure of the Synoptic Gospels has led to the development of tools such as the "Harmony of the Gospels," which aligns the parallel passages to facilitate side-by-side comparison. Despite their shared content, each Gospel also contains unique material that sets it apart from the others. For example, the Gospel of Matthew emphasizes Jesus' role as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, while the Gospel of Mark focuses on Jesus' actions and miracles. On the other hand, the Gospel of Luke includes narratives and parables not found in the other Synoptic Gospels, such as the parables of the Good Samaritan and the Prodigal Son. These differences, alongside the shared material, provide a rich tapestry of perspectives on the life and teachings of Jesus, offering valuable insights for biblical scholars and theologians.

Similarities Among the Synoptic Gospels

  1. Shared Events and Teachings: The Synoptic Gospels contain parallel accounts of many events and teachings of Jesus, such as the Sermon on the Mount and the Last Supper.
  2. Chronological Alignment: The Gospels often align chronologically, allowing for a cohesive narrative of Jesus' life and ministry.
  3. Common Language and Phrasing: There are instances where the Synoptic Gospels use similar language and phrasing, indicating a shared source or influence.

Differences Among the Synoptic Gospels

  1. Unique Content: Each Gospel contains unique stories, parables, and teachings not found in the other Gospels.
  2. Emphases and Themes: Matthew, Mark, and Luke emphasize different aspects of Jesus' life and ministry, reflecting the theological perspectives of their respective authors.
  3. Structural Variances: The arrangement and structure of the material within each Gospel differ, leading to distinct narrative styles and emphases.

The similarities and differences among the Synoptic Gospels offer a multifaceted portrayal of Jesus' life and teachings, enriching the understanding of Christian faith and history.

 

Theories on the Synoptic Problem

The Synoptic Problem refers to the scholarly inquiry into the literary relationship between the Synoptic Gospels, seeking to explain the similarities and differences among them. Several theories have been proposed to address this complex issue, each offering a unique perspective on the interplay between Matthew, Mark, and Luke. These theories provide valuable insights into the composition and transmission of the Gospels, shedding light on the early Christian community's methods of storytelling and theological expression.

1. Two-Source Hypothesis

The Two-Source Hypothesis posits that the Gospel of Mark was the first written Gospel and served as a primary source for both Matthew and Luke. In addition to Mark, Matthew and Luke also drew from a collection of sayings of Jesus, known as "Q" (from the German word "Quelle," meaning source), which is hypothesized to have been a written document or an oral tradition. This theory explains the extensive verbatim agreements between Matthew and Luke in passages not found in Mark, suggesting a shared source.

2. Farrer Theory

The Farrer Theory, also known as the Markan Priority with Lukean Posteriority, proposes that the Gospel of Mark was the first Gospel written, and Luke used both Mark and Matthew as sources. According to this theory, Luke did not have access to the hypothetical "Q" source, explaining the absence of Q material in the Gospel of Luke. The Farrer Theory seeks to account for the literary relationship between the Synoptic Gospels while emphasizing the dependence of Luke on both Mark and Matthew.

3. Two-Gospel Hypothesis

The Two-Gospel Hypothesis, attributed to the German scholar Griesbach, suggests that Matthew was the first Gospel written, followed by Luke, and then Mark. This theory posits that Mark condensed and abridged the content of Matthew and Luke, explaining the similarities between Mark and the other two Gospels. Proponents of the Two-Gospel Hypothesis argue that the variations in the order of events and the wording of passages can be attributed to the authors' individual stylistic choices.

4. Augustinian Hypothesis

The Augustinian Hypothesis, proposed by the early church father Augustine, suggests that Matthew was the first Gospel written, followed by Mark, who condensed Matthew's account, and then Luke, who incorporated both Matthew and Mark. This theory aligns with the traditional belief in the priority of Matthew's Gospel and seeks to harmonize the Synoptic Gospels within a sequential framework.

These theories on the Synoptic Problem offer diverse perspectives on the literary interdependence of the Synoptic Gospels, stimulating scholarly debate and contributing to a deeper understanding of the composition and transmission of the New Testament. Each theory presents compelling arguments and challenges, reflecting the complexity of the Synoptic Problem and the rich tapestry of early Christian storytelling and theological reflection.

 

The Importance of the Synoptic Gospels in Christian Tradition

The Synoptic Gospels, comprising Matthew, Mark, and Luke, hold profound significance within Christian tradition, serving as foundational texts that shape the understanding of Jesus' life, teachings, and the development of early Christianity. Their importance extends across theological, historical, and devotional dimensions, influencing the faith and practice of believers throughout the centuries.

1. Portrait of Jesus

The Synoptic Gospels provide a comprehensive portrait of Jesus Christ, presenting a cohesive narrative of his ministry, miracles, parables, and ethical teachings. Through these accounts, Christians gain insight into the compassionate and transformative nature of Jesus' mission, fostering a deepened understanding of his identity as the Son of God and the embodiment of divine love and grace.

2. Theological Foundations

In Christian theology, the Synoptic Gospels form the basis for core doctrinal beliefs and ethical principles. They elucidate essential concepts such as the kingdom of God, repentance, forgiveness, and the call to love one's neighbor. The teachings of Jesus, as depicted in the Synoptic Gospels, serve as a moral compass for believers, guiding their conduct and shaping their spiritual formation.

3. Historical Context

The Synoptic Gospels offer valuable historical insights into the socio-religious milieu of first-century Palestine and the early Christian community. They provide a window into the cultural, political, and religious dynamics of the time, enriching the understanding of Jesus' interactions with various societal groups and the challenges faced by the early followers of the Christian faith.

4. Liturgical Use

Within the liturgical practices of the Christian church, the Synoptic Gospels hold a central place. Their passages are frequently incorporated into lectionaries and form the basis for the proclamation of the Gospel during worship services. The readings from Matthew, Mark, and Luke contribute to the spiritual nourishment of congregations, offering timeless truths and narratives that continue to inspire and edify believers.

5. Spiritual Formation

For individual believers and communities of faith, the Synoptic Gospels serve as a wellspring of spiritual nourishment and guidance. The stories of Jesus' compassion, healing, and redemptive mission resonate deeply with the human experience, offering hope, comfort, and a vision of transformative renewal. Through the study and contemplation of the Synoptic Gospels, Christians are invited to deepen their faith, cultivate virtues, and embody the values of the kingdom of God.

6. Unity in Diversity

Despite the unique emphases and perspectives of each Gospel, the Synoptic Gospels collectively bear witness to the unity of the Christian message. They affirm the shared commitment to proclaiming the good news of salvation and embodying the love and justice exemplified by Jesus. The harmonious interplay of Matthew, Mark, and Luke underscores the diverse yet cohesive tapestry of Christian witness and belief.

In summary, the Synoptic Gospels occupy a central and indispensable role in Christian tradition, shaping the faith, ethics, worship, and spiritual formation of believers. Their enduring relevance and profound impact underscore their status as cherished and foundational texts within the broader narrative of the Christian faith.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, the designation of Matthew, Mark, and Luke as the Synoptic Gospels stems from their shared content, parallel structure, and the ability to be viewed together in parallel. The similarities and differences among the Synoptic Gospels offer a multifaceted portrayal of Jesus' life and teachings, enriching the understanding of Christian faith and history. The scholarly theories addressing the Synoptic Problem provide valuable insights into the composition and transmission of the Gospels, shedding light on the early Christian community's methods of storytelling and theological expression. Moreover, the Synoptic Gospels hold profound significance within Christian tradition, serving as foundational texts that shape the understanding of Jesus' life, teachings, and the development of early Christianity. Their importance extends across theological, historical, and devotional dimensions, influencing the faith and practice of believers throughout the centuries. The enduring relevance and profound impact of the Synoptic Gospels underscore their status as cherished and foundational texts within the broader narrative of the Christian faith.

Was this page helpful?

Related Post